Unlimited Backup Restore, FREE Trial

Carbonite launched its online backup service in May 2006. Its industry-first offer of unlimited backup space for a flat low price revolutionized the market for consumer and small business backup services. So far, Carbonite has backed up over 3 billion files and more importantly, restored over 200 million files that would have been lost forever.

Every year, 43% of computer users lose irreplaceable files. Carbonite users do not have to worry! Carbonite automatically and securely backs up the irreplaceable contents of their computers for only $54.95 per year ($99.95 for 2 years) – no matter how much stuff they need to backup. Restoring lost files takes just a few clicks.

Carbonite offers a risk-free trial so users can see how simple it is to securely back up their photos, emails, music, financial records and other important documents.More than 60% of people who download the FREE TRIAL end up subscribing to Carbonite!

The choice is yours: $1500 hard drive recovery OR $54.95/year for unlimited backup. Choose the Carbonite Online Backup! Subscribe Today!

Anti Spyware Support Software Selection

Spywares are a whole lot different from viruses and they cannot be clubbed together in the same category since they are completely apart from each other. Spywares are softwares which leak into a computer system without the user's knowledge and then it starts taking total control of the PC. It can hack into a computer and steal all the personal information of a user including login username, passwords, credit card numbers, bank account numbers etc..

In order to get rid of all these anomalies and complications, a user can always get a software. Almost all computers are infected with some spyware or the other. A lot of anti spyware downloads have been developed by companies and they are available to users everywhere. But the task here now is to select the best anti spyware software. There are a lot of anti spyware support available online especially if one Googles it online. A user can choose the best option available for their PC to by keeping in mind a few relevant things.

One of the most important things to consider while getting an anti spyware software is to choose one with an easy to use interface. If a product, no matter how efficient it is, is difficult to run and install then there is no point in getting one.

One should go for a antispyware support which gives real time protection. Some softwares remove spyware only after a manual scan without proactive protection. A good anti spyware should not only remove but also block malicious elements trying to get into the computer system.

A user should also go for a support software which gives them the option tp update database definitions regularly. Since fresh spywares are coded regularly, anti spyware companies should regularly update these definitions. Without the updates, the anti spyware support software is obsolete and not usable.

The user should also look for a comprehensive signature database in order to fend off and confront spyware attacks while choosing a good antispyware support software. It should have a strong anti spyware database.

It should have the versatility of scheduling the scans regularly as well. The customizable scan feature will by itself scan your PC for spyware and adware infections.

System performance backed by good customer support should also be considered while going for a good anti spyware support software. One should also look out for something which gives a good money back guarantee. It should enable a risk free guarantee and should give the user at least to a 30 day trial with a cent per cent monet back guarantee policy.

All these points are most relevant in order to enable a user to choose the best anti spyware software available at hand.

John is a technical expert associated with numerous tech firms including iYogi. iYogi is synergistically aligned to offer services and support like computer troubleshooting, Live computer help, Antispyware support, Live tech support. To sort out your computer issues please visit:http://www.iyogi.ca/

SideWiki: Visitors can Comment on Web Pages

Google has added SideWiki to the Google Toolbar to let Web surfers comment on any Web page. Participants will be able to comment on anything from doctors to Web security next to pages containing information. SideWiki comments appear as a browser sidebar, but it doesn't work with Google's own Chrome browser. Relevant topics will be moved to the top.

Google wants to know what you have to say on everything from medical problems to cities visited. On Wednesday, Google launched SideWiki, a toolbar feature that allows users to add information or thoughts next to any Web page.

Users are being encouraged to contribute insights on important decisions, tips on various topics, background information, and added perspective on new products and technologies.

"Many people visit the same pages looking for the same information, and much of the Web browsing is a one-way experience," said Eitan Bencuya, a Google spokesperson. "Google SideWiki helps open up the Web experience by allowing everyone, from a local expert to a renowned doctor, to share helpful information with others about any page on the web."

SideWiki appears as a browser sidebar once a user downloads the updated Google Tool bar, and is combined with Google Profiles so users can find information about the entry's author.

"Under the hood, we have even more technology that will take your entry about the current page and show it next to Web pages that contain the same snippet of text," wrote Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management, and Michal Cierniak, lead engineer for Google SideWiki, in a Google blog post. "We also bring in relevant posts from blogs and other sources that talk about the current page so that you can discover their insights more easily, right next to the page they refer to."

However, before users share their knowledge on a specific topic or Web page with the world, Google has developed a mechanism to put relevant topics higher in the sidebar. Those entries considered most useful will be listed at the top.

Repeating History

Engineers are not sifting through the entries to decide their SideWiki ranking.

"Rather than ordering entries chronologically, we use a unique algorithm that incorporates various signals about the entries to rank them in terms of usefulness," Bencuya said. "We also use community-monitored flagging as part of the algorithm so that you can vote entries up or down, or flag posts that are inappropriate."

Google has been tinkering with SideWiki for a long time, and observers say this technology has been tried in the past and failed. The free Windows-only Web browser plug-in, Third Voice, was introduced in 1999 and was not well accepted.

"Web-site owners hated it, as it they had no control over users placing content or comments over their content," said Michael Gartenberg, an Interpret analyst. "It will be interesting to see if Google is able to overcome the resistance that had plagued earlier efforts."

By Patricia Resende

http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=69144

Lenovo Ships Multi-Touch ThinkPad Tablet and Notebook

Lenovo is shipping the ThinkPad X200 Tablet and the ultrathin ThinkPad T400s notebook with multi-touch screens. The enterprise-targeted ThinkPads allow computing by finger gestures, and the T400s has a fingerprint sensor with LED indicators. A SimpleTap application available soon provides hardware access and customized actions.

Lenovo has begun shipping two multi-touch computing devices aimed at enterprise users. The world's fourth-largest PC maker also unveiled a new application called SimpleTap, which promises to bring simplicity to the touchscreens.

Leading the charge is Lenovo's ThinkPad X200 Tablet with Intel's 1.4-GHz Core 2 Duo processor and graphics media accelerator which targets people in sales, health care and education, said Lenovo Vice President David Hill.

"Tablet users can now use two finger touches to perform a variety of gestures, including pinching, zooming and tapping," Hill said. "You can also flick through documents, photos and Web pages with the touch of a finger."

Changing the Way We Work

Users of Lenovo's ultrathin ThinkPad T400s notebook -- which is aimed at professionals performing engineering and design tasks -- can now employ up to four fingers to manipulate objects, move images with two hands, and even have another person touch the screen to collaborate simultaneously, Hill said. "These demanding users can now manipulate four fingers on the T400s screen not only to replace traditional cursor movements, but to change the way they work," Hill added.

The T400s also sports a fingerprint sensor with LED indicators that allows users to view the state of their systems at a glance. "Corporate users, including our employees, have found this to be a convenient feature, since they can verify their PC is locked when they leave their desk," Lenovo said.

Lenovo said the advanced capacitive technology built into its multi-touch displays makes them sensitive and responsive to even the slightest touch of a finger. Moreover, the company says it has optimized the firmware to help compensate for the slightly imprecise taps on the screen that can occur when users close a window or navigate the start menu.

"With touchscreens increasingly becoming part of more devices we use routinely and continued improvement of the technology, including the integration of touch in the upcoming Windows 7 OS, the environment for making touch part of our Tablet PC and ThinkPad T400s laptop experience couldn't be better," said Lenovo Vice President Sam Dusi.

By Mark Long

http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=68967

Intel Outlines Objections to EC's $1.45 Billion Fine

Intel has outlined its objections to the $1.45 billion fine imposed by the European Commission in a case started by rival Advanced Micro Devices in 2000. Intel's Chuck Mulloy said the EC got the facts and economics wrong. Intel also told the EC that AMD increased its market share and profits during the period in dispute.

Regulatory rules have kicked some sand on an anticompetitive case against Intel dating back to 2000. The European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, on Monday published a summary of Intel's appeal of the EC's $1.45 billion fine.

Intel officials say they stand by their decision to contest the fine imposed in May. It was the largest ever levied by the EC on a single firm.

The case against Intel began in 2000 when Intel rival Advanced Micro Devices alleged Intel's business practices were anticompetitive. The chipmaker was accused of offering discounts to European computer manufacturers to purchase Intel's processors instead of AMD's. It wasn't until 2007 that the commission decided to fine Intel, and the fine was approved in May.

"We think the decision by the commission was wrong in terms of interpreting the law," said Chuck Mulloy, Intel's director of communications , in a phone interview. "They got the facts wrong; they got the economics wrong."

Proving the Commission Wrong

In the EC's summary, Intel said the commission had not provided evidence to prove Intel was breaking any laws or acting anticompetitive.

First, Intel said, the commission failed to analyze whether Intel's rebate arrangements with customers were implemented in the European community and had immediate, substantial and direct effects within the European community.

Intel also said the commission failed to prove Intel's rebate arrangements were conditional upon consumers buying all x86 CPUs from Intel rather than AMD.

The commission further failed to address evidence showing that during the period of alleged infringement, AMD substantially increased its market share and its profitability and that its lack of success in certain market segments and with certain OEMS was the result of its own shortcomings, according to Intel.

"Prices are falling, capacity is increasing," Mulloy said. "During the period of the case, AMD's prices increased and market share grew," he added. "In fact, during the period in question, AMD's market share grew by fivefold."

Intel's complaints don't end there. Intel also states in its appeal that the commission failed to find a link between conditional customer discounts and the decisions by Intel customers not to buy from AMD.

Finally, Intel contends the commission did not prove the company engaged in a long-term strategy to foreclose competitors.

Lengthy Process

Now that the EC has published its summary, it and Intel will proceed with further steps, which include an ongoing exchange of filings by both Intel and the commission.

"At some point there will be a set of oral arguments before the CFI (Court of First Instance), culminating in a decision anywhere from 18 to 24 months from now," Mulloy said.

The CFI is an independent court attached to the European Court of Justice that hears disputes and appeals relating to trademarks and other issues. CFI is tasked with ensuring that the law is observed in the interpretation and application of the treaties.

Asked whether Intel will come out on top in the end, Mulloy said: "Of course we believe we'll succeed; otherwise, why would we appeal?"

By Patricia Resende

http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=68965&full_skip